Has the lack of asset diversification in DC retirement plans been a costly missed opportunity?

Georgetown CRI (In conjunction with CEM)

 

This Georgetown CRI study, in conjunction with CEM, asks the question, “Should DC plan sponsors emulate DB plans by increasing or introducing allocations to illiquid assets within target date fund options?” This analysis focuses on the period 2011–2020 and assesses how DC plan participants’ experiences would have changed had DC TDFs made higher allocations to illiquid assets during this time. The results suggest the potential increase in returns may have been a missed opportunity.

Insights

More Related Articles

Beyond the Premium: A Better Way to Benchmark Private Credit 

How does CEM account for leverage?

What assets are used as the basis for comparing investment costs?